It's A No-Brainer, Liberals: You Can't Condemn Incest if You Support Gay Marriage and Transgenderism
Here we are again. It seems we can’t even manage to go a few days without a grotesque story about sexual depravity hitting the national news. The reports have become as common as roadkill and they reek just as much. At this point, I would almost welcome the stench of a dead possum or the sight of a rotting armadillo carcass more than a televised headline about the latest actor or senator entangled in a web of lies, rumors and debauchery. Between all of the celebrities and politicians accused of sexual misconduct and Cosmo’s recent attempt to romanticize incest by re-tweeting its article about Melissa and Brian, I think it’s safe to say that our psychotic culture has willingly and gleefully slid down the slippery slope, “laughing all the way.” (All that’s left is to start ringing the jingle bells as we plunge to our death.)
To recap: We started with the invention of gay marriage. Then we normalized “transgenderism.” Then we tossed sexual morality out the window altogether and said, “To Hell with everything else.” We stopped holding ourselves to any standards. Then we stopped holding our leaders and politicians to any standards. Besides, they’re just regular people like us, right? Then we stopped caring about the standards of Hollywood and its effect on our society.
What could possibly go wrong from here? I guess I shouldn’t overreact though. I mean, it’s not like Disney is brainwashing little kids yet or anything. Oh…wait. Never-mind.
Anyway, speaking of incest, a story surfaced on the Internet last week about an Oklahoma woman who married her biological mother in 2016 after they had reunited and “hit it off,” according to FOX NEWS. On Tuesday, Misty Spann (26-years-old) officially plead guilty to incest. Misty’s mother, Patricia (44-years-old), has plead “not guilty” and now has a court date slated for January. If found guilty, she could face 10 years in prison. Apparently Patricia even wed one of her own sons back in 2008, a marriage that was “annulled” two years later due to “incest,” according to The Associated Press. (Gee, imagine that.) However, she assumed that her marriage to Misty would be legal since she had “lost custody of her daughter and two sons years ago.”
You might remember a piece I wrote last April about a guy named Ben Ford. Ben left his wife to pursue a sexual and romantic relationship with his mother Kim West who had given him up for adoption over 30 years before they were reunited. Their story went viral around the world, particularly in the UK, and was even plastered on the cover of British publications like The New Day. Thousands of folks took to social media to celebrate their “loving relationship” (conveniently redefined as Genetic Sexual Attraction) while others, like myself, condemned it as morally wrong and sinful. Ironically though, many of the liberal progressives who harshly denounced Ben and Kim’s incestuous behavior — and now Misty and Patricia’s behavior — simultaneously support gay marriage and transgenderism.
One of the many inherent problems with this position, though, is that you simply can't denounce one form of sexual deviancy while at the same time applauding the others, particularly when the other perversions have led to the cultural acceptance of the one you’re currently condemning. Your entire argument, which was horrifically weak from the beginning, just ends up falling apart and now you look like an idiot. You can’t say, “Well, love is love,” in defense of gay marriage, but then say, “Incest should be illegal.” After all, the whole “love is love” shtick is what brought us the false premise of gay marriage in the first place, which subsequently opened up the doors for redefining any and every relationship to be whatever those two (or three, or six or thirteen) people want the so-called “relationship” to be. Once our culture dismantled the institution of marriage — and all of its rules and parameters — every “relational” possibility was instantly placed on the table, including incest, polygamy, pedophilia or whatever.
Moreover, you can’t say, “If a man feels like he’s a woman, then he’s a woman,” while also saying, “A brother and sister can’t or shouldn’t feel romantic love for each other.” The entire argument behind “transgenderism” is literally predicated on the absurd notion that emotions reign supreme and completely override human anatomy and biology and reality. Emotions dictate everything now. If you believe that, then you must apply it to everything else. Who are you to say that a brother and sister or mother and son or a pirate and his parrot can’t fall in love and live happily ever after? That would just be terribly bigoted and judgmental of you.
So, if the majority of liberals support gay marriage and transgenderism (and they do), then they really have no choice but to support incest as well, which I fully believe will be legalized on the national level within my lifetime. Somewhere in a future presidential election, progressives and radical Democrats will eventually be forced to maintain some shred of intellectual honesty and cave to this ideological monster they’ve created. And make no mistake: the legalization of other sexual perversions will follow quickly behind.
This is why Christians and true conservatives (the few who still remain) must remain steadfast in our beliefs and convictions. We must hold our ground here and now. We can’t afford to comprise in these cultural arenas. If we abandon truth in one arena — like marriage — we will risk abandoning it in every arena. And that will surely be the beginning of the end.